03/06/2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

5. QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION Commissioner O'Bryan said he had suggestions for staff going forward. He addressed comments from certain speakers regarding new homeowners paying higher taxes because of the "Save our Home" discrepancy, and comments about impact fees paying for all infrastructure. Commissioner O'Bryan expressed his personal concerns that builders were not coming in and building affordable homes. He wanted to see the Board take the time to discuss the matter in a timely manner; he did not support lowering our level of service standards as it is what makes this County unique; and he did not think any temporary pause or freeze in the current impact fees would be subsidizing any new development. His big concern was that the methodology we are using right now does not allow us to move or adjust those impact fees in a timely manner either up or down, to take into account current market conditions and the cost involved to provide that infrastructure. Commissioner O'Bryan agreed with Mr. Mechling and did not think that the State road pricing should be included when we look into traffic cost and construction. On the issue of affordable housing, he wanted to see, instead of three categories, a four -category breakdown dropping the lower level to less than 1200 square feet, and impact fees would be staggered proportionately based on size. He concurred that we desperately need to reevaluate how we assess, in particular, traffic impact fees to our commercial, industrial, and retail development. He also wanted to see a concentrated effort from staff, the Consultants, and the members of the community, taking a real hard look at commercial/industrial impacts, because he believed there was double-dipping and he was not clear how that is assessed. Commissioner Flescher appreciated everyone's comments. He remarked that this examination of our impact fees has been done by schedule, and the timing could not be worse for 17 March 6, 2008 Public Workshop