Laserfiche WebLink
SEP 51979 41 PA -Mo <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED REGARDING THE MATERIAL SUBMITTED, <br />AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER AND ATTORNEY <br />COLLINS REVIEW IT TOGETHER. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER SIEBERT, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE PUBLICATION <br />AND -ADVERTISEMENT OF SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS IN THE LM -L AND M-1 <br />DISTRICTS. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT HIS DEPARTMENT <br />PLANS TO COME UP WITH THE DEFINITION OF A MAJOR OR MINOR APPLICA- <br />TION IN ORDER TO STREAMLINE THE PROCESS, SO THAT THERE WILL NOT <br />BE A LONG WAITING PERIOD. HE POINTED OUT THAT SOME OF THE <br />PROBLEMS RELATE TO THE APPLICANT NOT FURNISHING THE RIGHT INFORMA- <br />TION TO THEIR DEPARTMENT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE PROVISION REGARDING <br />DRAINAGE MAY CREATE PROBLEMS BECAUSE MORE DEFINITIVE CRITERIA <br />IS NEEDED; THE MAJOR PROBLEM IS THAT THE DEVELOPERS, ARE ONLY <br />GOING TO HAVE TO MEET THE 25 YEAR STORM CRITERIA. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER STATED THAT THE PLANNING $ <br />ZONING COMMISSION WILL MAKE THEIR RECOMMENDATION BASED ON MEAN- <br />INGFUL CRITERIA, AND IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, THE NEXT STEP WOULD <br />BE TO COME TO THE BOARD. HE FELT THAT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br />SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE DECISION TO THE BOARD AS <br />WELL AS'THE APPLICANT. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT EVERYTHING SHOULD STAND REVIEW, <br />OTHERWISE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ALL KINDS OF HODGE-PODGE DEVELOP - <br />Mae <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER THEN EXPLAINED ABOUT THE HYDRO - <br />GRAPH TO THE BOARD. DISCUSSION CONTINUED ABOUT THE 3 AND 25 <br />YEAR STORM, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAIN THAT WOULD FALL IN A 24 HOUR <br />PERIOD. HE NOTED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH IS USING THE 3 TO <br />25 YEAR CRITERIA. <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER THEN DISCUSSED NOT ISSUING A <br />ZONING PERMIT UNTIL THEIR DEPARTMENT HAD SOME VERIFICATION, WHICH <br />IW4 <br />