Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Waller <br /> explained that his office administrator had been handling it; the landscaping <br />supply company gave excuses that materials were not available; but then he found out that the <br />company went out of business so they had to go to an alternate source. <br />Chairman Neuberger agreed the fine should not be changed, but if we owe him money, <br />perhaps it will be a wash. <br />County Administrator Baird suggested the Board proceed with care. He suggested Mr. <br />Waller pay the fine and he would meet with Mr. Waller on the utility matter. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Lowther, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wheeler, to keep the fine <br />in place. <br /> <br />Under discussion, Commissioner Davis recounted a previous discussion with Mr. Waller <br />that resulted in a prior reduction of the code enforcement fine that took into consideration delays <br />caused by hurricanes. <br /> <br />The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Chairman Neuberger advised Mr. Waller to get with County Administrator Baird on the <br />Utilities Department matter. <br /> <br />(Clerk’s Note: A copy of the chronology on this case was given to the Commissioners and <br />a copy is on file with the backup in the Office of the Clerk to the Board.) <br /> <br /> <br />April 11, 2006 20 <br /> <br />