My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/12/2005 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
04/12/2005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2021 5:08:42 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 5:59:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Migration
Meeting Date
04/12/2005
Archived Roll/Disk#
3001
Book and Page
128, 648-677
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
233
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bob Johnson <br />, Coral Wind Subdivision, commented that his neighbors are looking <br />for less density in their community. He felt the Board only had one choice and that is to deny the <br />rezoning and have the developer resubmit his request later for RS-3. <br />th <br />Al Vadere <br /> 2380 80 Court, was concerned who would monitor the development to <br />see that it is built-out only to 2.8 units per acre or less and he questioned the timetable. <br />Discussion ensued. <br />Bruce Barkett <br /> posed several questions regarding the Comp Plan to Director Bob <br />Keating on the proposed rezoning of agricultural land near the urban service area. He wanted to <br />establish a record that would stand in court. He handed out copoies of the Future Land Use <br />Element Table 2.13 (page 44 of the backup) to be made part of the record. <br />th <br />Peter Nyhart, <br /> 2335 80 Court, wanted to ask Attorney Barkett if the applicant is <br />agreeing with the 2.7 or 2.8 units per acre. Bruce Barkett replied that he does not represent the <br />applicant for the development. <br />Commissioner Davis spoke on behalf of the Board that there is no assurance that no <br />more than 2.8 units per acre would be developed, however, they are working as aggressively as <br />possible to see that these recommendations are put forth on this development. <br /> <br />There were no additional speakers and the Chairman closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Bowden for discussion, to <br />deny staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bowden commented this property is challenged with compatibility. <br />There is no assurance on the build-out, just an educated guess. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler opposed this request for several reasons. He found only one <br />RS-6 zoned subdivision to be in line with this rezoning. He felt it was unfortunate that RS-3 and <br />APRIL 12, 2005 <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.