Laserfiche WebLink
for the special assessment project, as recommended in the <br />memorandum of April 1, 2005. <br /> <br />12. COUNTY ATTORNEY – GROWTH AWARENESS <br />COMMITTEE - IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN <br />RECOMMENDATIONS THROUGH INVOKING THE <br />PENDING ORDINANCE DOCTRINE. <br />Assistant County Attorney Bill DeBraal briefed the Board of action taken leading up <br />to presenting the Pending Ordinance Doctrine and the legal aspects involved. He mentioned the <br />caveat should the Board not act on it in due time and make it ordinance, developers that rely on it <br />and if it fails or does not come to pass, may be able to come back for damages due to the <br />detrimental reliance on the ordinance without the public hearing. He did not see any risks if they <br />move forward and invoke the Doctrine. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Vice Chairman Neuberger, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Wheeler for discussion, to <br />invoke the Pending Ordinance Doctrine and direct staff to <br />apply the modifications as recommended in the <br />memorandum of April 6, 2005. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler wanted Chapter 913, Item 6 eliminated, leaving the <br />th <br />affidavit of exemption at 19 lots, not 4 lots. He referred to the March 15 Board meeting when the <br />Board reached a consensus for the affidavit of exemption to be maintained at the 19-lot threshold <br />eliminating the 4 lots. He continued seeking clarification of Item 9. <br />Planning Director Stan Boling suggested the Board consider adding: <br />1. A 50-foot buffer requirement for projects adjacent to the urban service area <br />and bordered by agriculture. <br />APRIL 12, 2005 <br />15 <br /> <br />