My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/20/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
04/20/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:26:20 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/20/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2927
Book and Page
126, 862-897
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
419
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Eric Smith, <br />who appeared with his wife, stated that they were building a nearby <br />home on 5 acres. From what he has seen he has no objections to this project although he would <br />prefer a lower density. . <br />John Williams <br />, 1535 Smuggler’s Cove, made two points. First, he understood that <br />th <br />traffic at the intersection at 58 Avenue and SR-60 will be pushed beyond its current poor Level of <br />Service “D”; it will cost the taxpayers in the future to raise that LOS. He asked that issue be <br />addressed in some way in the future. Second, it is obvious that the USA line cannot stand. He <br />stressed that it will only stand if the issue is brought forward to a referendum that would allow the <br />taxpayers the right to vote if future Commissioners decided to move the USA more to the west. <br />Brian Heady <br />, Vero Beach, expounded on his ideas that paving over agriculture is <br />not good; that it is not government’s job to provide jobs or affordable housing; that there is a need <br />for schools in that neighborhood, and that wider streets are not necessarily an improvement. He <br />also commented on the disparities of governments in saving large oak trees. <br />Rusty Banack <br />, 6075 Atlantic Boulevard, recognized the rights to develop this <br />property and understood the property owner’s plight. He wanted to see it done tastefully. He <br />asked for clarification regarding future paving of Atlantic Boulevard; the possible widening of the <br />th <br />drainage canal; and the possibility of a future bridge at 66 Avenue. <br />th <br />Director Boling specified that 16 Street would not cross the Main Relief Canal; <br />the plan is for College Lane to be extended through the Indian River Community College, Mueller <br />thth <br />Campus, and connect back to 66 Avenue north of 16 Street. Staff’s understanding is that the <br />Indian River Farms Water Control District has acknowledged and recognized that several parcels <br />need Atlantic Boulevard for access to their property and that access will continue into the future. <br />Public Works Director James Davis agreed with Director Boling’s explanation that <br />thth <br />College Lane would be the major connection between 58 and 66 Avenues; that Atlantic <br />Boulevard is a necessary road and the drainage district will allow it to be paved. What is proposed <br />will be safer than what is there today. He predicted that College Lane will carry a lot of that traffic <br />th <br />when drivers are trying to avoid the intersection of SR-60 and 58 Avenue. <br />April 20, 2004 <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.