My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/20/2004 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
04/20/2004 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:26:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/20/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2927
Book and Page
126, 898-908
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
420
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Education, Libraries, Fire/Emergency Services, Law Enforcement, Public Buildings, Parks and <br />Recreation Facilities. The areas under study are capital costs of these facilities, land and <br />equipment. <br />Mr. Wallace <br /> reviewed the policy summary, detailing the recommendations <br />needing a decision from the County to move forward. The policy decisions necessary to proceed <br />with the study involved the development of a brochure and enhancing the website, adding the <br />position of Impact Fees Administrator within the County, policies on how to implement impact <br />fees, when to collect impact fees, establishing interlocal agreements with the cities and the school <br />board, providing provisions for developer credits, areas of exemption, areas to benefit, <br />Mr. Wallace <br />establishing a level of service, and updates to the program. pointed out that impact <br />fee revenue must be spent in a reasonable time period (within 6 years) otherwise the applicant has <br />Mr. Wallace <br />the right to file for a refund if the monies are not spent to his benefit. In summary, <br />outlined their intended progress over the next four months. <br /> <br />Chairman Ginn stated during Mr. Wallace’s presentation that enough notification <br />has been given to the public regarding this study and that any ordinance would become effective <br />the day after it comes back from the state. <br /> <br />Tyson Smith <br /> from the Law Firm Freilich, Leitner and Carlisle, spoke on the legal <br />parameters that constrict the adoption, creation of, and implementation of impact fees, and what <br />distinguishes impact fees from other revenue generated sources. One of the key distinguishers is <br />proportionality. Different from taxes, impact fees have to be proportionate in amount based on the <br />need being created by the development paying the fee, and a substantial benefit from the <br />expenditure of the fees has to flow back towards the development paying the fees. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />APRIL 20, 2004 <br />4 <br />SPECIAL MEETING <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.