Laserfiche WebLink
BooK 41 FAUF648 <br />DISTRICT WAS JUST ASKED IF THEY HAD A -NY OBJECTION TO THE COUNTY <br />POSTING SPEED LIMIT SIGNS. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT SINCE THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT <br />TOOK NO ACTION, WE CANNOT ASSUME WE HAVE THEIR APPROVAL, AND THE <br />ATTORNEY AGREED THAT THE ROAD ONLY CAN BE POSTED WITH THE CONSENT <br />OF THE ROAD OWNERS. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THERE WAS A TIME LIMIT ON <br />OUR ACCEPTING MAINTENANCE OF THESE ROADS, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED <br />THAT ITIS A VERY LOOSE DOCUMENT AND ALLOWS EITHER PARTY TO TERMINATE. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT HE VOTED AGAINST THIS <br />AGREEMENT BEFORE AND STILL FEELS THAT THE MAINTENANCE WE ARE DOING <br />SHOULD BE IN A CONTRACT WITH THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT WHERE THEY PAY <br />FOR IT SINCE WE ARE IMPROVING THEIR ROADS. RE POINTED_OUT THAT THE <br />PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE, MOVED THERE OF THEIR OWN ACCORD, AND THEY ARE <br />NOT ON A COUNTY ROAD. <br />COMMISSIONER DEESON STATED THAT THEIR ARGUMENT IS THAT <br />THEY PAY COUNTY TAXES, AND COMMISSIONER LOY NOTED THAT ARGUMENT WILL <br />GO OUT THE WINDOW THIS YEAR WHEN OUR NEW MUNICIPAL SERVICE FUND IS <br />SET UP. SHE STATED THAT SHE WOULD VOTE AGAINST THIS MOTION BECAUSE <br />SHE FELT WE ARE GETTING IN DEEPER AND DEEPER, <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONERS LYONS <br />AND DEESON VOTED IN FAVOR; COMMISSIONERS SIEBERT, LOY AND CHAIRMAN <br />WODTKE VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE MOTION FAILED. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS WILL WRITE A LETTER EXPLAINING THE BOARDS POSITION <br />ON THIS MATTER. <br />ATTORNEY ROBERT JACKSON APPEARED BEFORE THE BOARD ACCOM- <br />PANIED BY ATTORNEY BYRON COOKSEY, WHO REPRESENTS FLORIDA LIVING <br />CARE, INC. <br />ATTORNEY JACKSON, WHO IS ALSO A TRUSTEE ON THE HOSPITAL <br />BOARD, SUMMARIZED HIS DISCUSSIONS WITH VARIOUS CITY OFFICIALS IN <br />REGARD TO THE MATTER OF A WATER ALLOCATION OF 10,000 GALLONS PER <br />DAY FOR FLORIDA LIVING CARE AND THE AGREEMENT BY THE HOSPITAL TO <br />RETURN 100,000 GALLONS OF THEIR ALLOCATION TO THE COUNTY. IT SEEMS <br />THERE IS QUITE A BIT OF CONFUSION ABOUT HOW THE MATTER STANDS, AND <br />HE AND ATTORNEY COOKSEY HAVE REVIEWED THE TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT WITH <br />Emo <br />