Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER LOY, TO ALLOCATE FLORIDA LIVING CARE, INC., AN ADDI- <br />TIONAL 10,000.GALLONS PER DAY OUT OF THE 100,000 GALLON ALLOCATION <br />RETURNED BY THE HOSPITAL. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND COMMISSIONER LYONS FELT WE SHOULD <br />ADD HOW THE SEWER WILL BE HANDLED, BUT ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT IS <br />THE PETITIONER S PROBLEM TO HANDLE WITH THE CITY BECAUSE THE COUNTY <br />IS IN NO POSITION TO HELP WITH THE SEWER, <br />COMMISSIONER Loy SUGGESTED THAT THE MOTION SHOULD RELATE TO <br />GRANTING THE ALLOCATION FOR, THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF NURSING HOME CARE, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT WITHDREW HIS MOTION FOR PURPOSES OF <br />REWORDING, AND COMMISSIONER Loy WITHDREW HER SECOND, <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER.L.OY, TO.GRANT AN ALLOCATION OF UP TO IO,000.GPD AS REQUESTED <br />BY FLORIDA LIVING CARE, INC., FOR THE EXPRESS PURPOSE OF A NURSING <br />HOME FACILITY WHICH HAS RECEIVED A CERTIFICATE OF NEED, SUBJECT TO <br />AN ENGINEERING REPORT THAT IT IS FEASIBLE TO TIE-IN; ALL TIE-IN AND <br />OTHER EXPENSES TO BE THE EXPENSE OF THE PETITIONER, IN ADDITION, <br />AN ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION WILL BE REQUIRED STATING THAT 10,000 GPD <br />IS REQUIRED FOR THE NURSING HOME OPERATION,. AND IF IT IS NOT, THEN <br />WHATEVER LESSER FIGURE IS NEEDED; SAID 10,000 GPD TO COME OUT OF THE <br />EXCESS 100,OOO,GPD FROM THE HOSPITAL'S PREVIOUS ALLOCATION. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT WE HAVE NO JURISDICTION <br />RIGHT NOW FOR A RATE FOR THIS AREA, AND WE WILL EITHER HAVE TO <br />INCLUDE IT IN THE U.D.U. AREA OR SET A COUNTYWIDE RATE, <br />FRANK ZORC INTERJECTED THAT HE MADE A REQUEST SEVERAL <br />MONTHS AGO FOR GALLONAGE OUT OF THE AMOUNT RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL, <br />AND HE WAS REFUSED AT THAT TIME. HE NOW WISHED TO KNOW IF OTHERS <br />WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR THE REMAINING 90,000 GALLONS, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE BOARD MUST FIRST VOTE <br />ON THE MOTION ON THE FLOOR AND THEN DISCUSS MR. ZORC'S QUESTION. <br />HE FELT WE MUST DEFINE WHO IS GOING TO SERVICE WHAT SINCE THIS IS <br />NOT BEING DONE BY THE TAC COMMITTEE. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />moo - 41 PAGE 651 <br />OCT 101979 23 <br />