My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/10/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/10/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:15:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/10/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER LYONS DISCUSSED ISSUING A LICENSE TO SOMEONE <br />WHO HAS A MEDICAL CERTIFICATE STATING THAT HE IS MENTALLY COMPETENT, <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED ABOUT LIMITING THE LICENSE <br />JUST FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, I,E„ THE TRANSPORTING OF MONEY, BUT <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO LIMIT A PERMIT, <br />SHERIFF JOYCE FELT THAT IN MOST CASES THERE IS NO NEED <br />FOR SOMEONE TO HAVE A PERMIT TO CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON, AND NOTED <br />THAT IT CREATES A PROBLEM WHEN A PERSON WHO IS LICENSED WEARS HIS <br />WEAPON INTO A STORE OR A BAR, DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON "MANUAL POSSES- <br />SIONWHICH IS ILLEGAL, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE GIVES <br />THE BOARD A BASIS ON WHICH TO DENY SOME OF THE SPURIOUS REQUESTS. <br />SHERIFF .JOYCE QUESTIONED SECTION 14 (RECIPROCITY), HE <br />FELT. THAT WE SHOULD NOT ACCEPT THE FACE VALUE OF A LICENSE FROM <br />ANOTHER COUNTY WHICH MIGHT NOT HAVE AS STRINGENT STANDARDS AND <br />STATED THAT HIS DEPUTIES ONLY HONOR LICENSES OF OTHER COUNTIES WHEN <br />PEOPLE ARE PASSING THROUGH, <br />THE BOARD AGREED THAT ANYONE LICENSED IN THIS COUNTY SHOULD <br />GET THE LICENSE ACCORDING TO OUR PROVISIONS AND NOT ON THE BASIS OF <br />ANOTHER COU.NTY�S ORDINANCE, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD DELETE SECTION 14, <br />AND THE BOARD AGREED, <br />THE -CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD, <br />.JOE SUIT, MAYOR OF FELLSMERE, STATED THAT HE IS NOT OPPOSED <br />TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE, WHICH HE AGREED IS BADLY NEEDED, BUT HE <br />FELT THERE ARE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR SOME PEOPLE WITHIN THE COUNTY TO <br />HAVE A.PERMIT AND. THAT SOME OF THE REQUIREMENTS ARE QUITE STRINGENT, <br />MR, SUIT STATED THAT EVERY TIME WE AMEND BY ORDINANCE THE PERSONAL <br />RIGHTS..:GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION, HE TAKES EXCEPTION TO IT, <br />HE POINTED OUT THAT THE PEOPLE WHO WOULD APPLY WOULD BE PRIMARILY <br />THE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS SINCE CRIMINALS DO NOT GET PERMITS, MR, <br />SUIT STATED THAT HE HAS BEEN IN LAW ENFORCEMENT FOR FIVE YEARS; HE <br />DOES NOT HAVE AMPLE TIME TO ENROLL IN A COURSE TO PROVE HE IS CAPABLE <br />27 <br />F�uK <br />OCT 10 1979 �1 FAGE 655':.� <br />J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.