Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 10 1979 �''}' <br />Boa 4-1 FACE .! <br />SECURE A PLACE FOR THE INDIAN RIVER CABLEVISION HEARING, POSSIBLY <br />THE COMMUNITY BUILDING IN SEBASTIAN, AND SET A DATE. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT <br />AERODROME SUBDIVISION PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION ARE REQUESTING <br />THAT THE COUNTY PAVE A 1/4 MILE SECTION OF THEIR ENTRANCE ROAD. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO THE COUNTY DOING THIS <br />WORK AT THE PROPERTY OWNER S EXPENSE.IF THEY WISHED TO CONTRACT WITH <br />THE COUNTY, BUT ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR NELSON NOTED THAT THIS IS <br />A PRIVATE ROAD, AND HE FELT WE SHOULD REFUSE THE PROJECT. HE RE— <br />FERRED TO THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MADE BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR. <br />TO: Neil Nelson, Assistant County Administrator <br />FROM: David M. Rever, Planning & Zoning Director Af <br />SUBJECT: Paving Of road Into Aerodrome Subdivision <br />Jack and I had discussed this situation sometime in the past month, and <br />it is my recollection that we concurred on the following recommendations: <br />1) That the County should not get involved in the construction <br />of private roads. Doing so would open the door for everyone, <br />including developers, to expect the County to construct all <br />roads within its jurisdictional boundaries. <br />2) The present R.O.W. for a road is insufficient to meet any <br />minimum standard. Therefore even a public road would require <br />the acquisition of additional R.O.W. <br />3) All other restraints aside, the construction (paving) of this <br />road would benefit a very small segment of the county population <br />both now and in the future. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT THIS IS A PIECE OF PROPERTY <br />OWNED BY ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL BODY, THE INDIAN RIVER FARMS DRAINAGE <br />DISTRICT, AND ASKED IF WE WOULD BE OUT OF LINE IN COOPERATING WITH <br />THAT BODY TO HELP ON PRICES BY SAYING WE WOULD DO THE WORK AND BE <br />REIMBURSED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT POINTED OUT THAT THE DRAINAGE <br />DISTRICT IS NOT REQUESTING THIS, AND HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THE <br />BOARD REFUSED PAT CORRIGAN THE VERY SAME REQUEST. <br />THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FELT THAT THESE PEOPLE CHOSE <br />TO LIVE IN THESE PLACES, AND HE DID NOT FEEL THE COUNTY HAS THE <br />RESPONSIBILITY. <br />EIR <br />a � s <br />