My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/24/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
04/24/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 4:29:18 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call The Source
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/24/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4018
Subject
The Source Special Call Meeting
Jurisdictional Determination
I Am Ministries
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7238
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
on the proper form, and whether it was filed in the proper place, accompanied by the required <br />fee. Therefore, if the Board finds that it doesn't, then it should find it does not have jurisdiction <br />over the matter. <br />Planning Director Stan Boling had no further comments, but offered to answer <br />questions from the Board. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan asked if staff ever received a check from Mr. O'Haire or the <br />Metzes, as part of the appeal, and whether it was good. Staff affirmed that they had. <br />Commissioner Flescher inquired about the timeframe for a response to Mr. Metz and <br />Mr. Hedin, as far as an inquiry; whether it was written or verbal; and whether it was customary <br />for any correspondence to go out to a community when issues of this nature might impact the <br />community. Director Boling replied, "No" to the latter, saying this is a zoning confirmation <br />letter, and there was nothing in our Ordinance that requires us to notify residents in such matters. <br />Commissioner Wheeler inquired who gets the 21 days notification; what is actual <br />Notice; and wanted an example of the letter/notice that was sent to Ocean Concrete. He also <br />wanted to know if staff ever explains the process of appeal in a notification letter. <br />Commissioner Wheeler did not believe to be valid the comments by Mr. Simmons about Mr. <br />Hedin's ignorance of the law, because he was a County official. <br />Commissioner Wheeler remarked that this was one of the most difficult issues he has <br />dealt with, and he could see a difference with the Ocean Concrete case. He wanted to deal with <br />the merits of the actual facts rather than a technicality. He felt neighborhood residents were at a <br />tremendous disadvantage to these issues, because they were ignorant of the process; they did not <br />understand what they needed to do in a timely fashion; they did not have proper notice, and that <br />could probably be an error. He felt they needed to revisit County rules to keep people notified. <br />April 24, 2008 15 <br />Special Call Meeting (The Source) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.