My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/24/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
04/24/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 4:29:18 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call The Source
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/24/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4018
Subject
The Source Special Call Meeting
Jurisdictional Determination
I Am Ministries
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7238
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Director Keating said it keeps getting more confusing and the facts keep getting more <br />muddled. He said they were still operating under the provisions in Bruce Barkett's letter, that <br />there was a crisis counseling staff out there from right after 2005 until 2006. Therefore, staff s <br />determination was based on the fact that the use never completely stopped. However, hearing <br />both arguments, he felt they were even more unsure after today than they were before. <br />Commissioner Wheeler remarked that after today, we need to look at our procedure on <br />these things. <br />CLOSING ARGUMENTS BYATTORNEYHENDERSON <br />Attorney Henderson, sought to disprove cessation of use, based on the earlier testimony <br />of Ms. Wakefield. He admitted that the property was vacated on April 1, 2005 by residents and <br />that buildings were in use by employees, the Mobile Crisis Response Team that moved back in <br />on May 15. Therefore, at first glance, one might argue that there is a one-year period that the <br />property was not in use, and therefore the ordinance requires that the nonconforming use is no <br />longer valid. But he is saying that is not quite the case, and it is not the proper analysis, because <br />there has to be shown an intent to abandon the use. He referenced an earlier point by Attorney <br />O'Haire who contended that Alcohope signed a lease in 2003 to move elsewhere, which proved <br />they intended to abandon their operation. That, he felt, was not the criteria, because according to <br />testimony they did not move out until April 1St <br />Attorney Henderson argued that the criterion was, what did New Horizons intend. He <br />recapped the testimony from Linda Wakefield and the Pastor from the Crossings which purports <br />that there was an effort being made from April 1, 2005, all the way to the acquisition of the <br />property by The Source, to find a buyer for the property that would use it as a residential <br />treatment center. Ms. Wakefield also testified that the Director of New Horizons recognized the <br />April 24, 2008 47 <br />Special Call Meeting (The Source) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.