04/04/2006 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Attorney Collins confirmed that recollection and stated that there is a concern that if you are opposed to conditions there has to be an impact that is roughly proportional to the benefit you th must provide. If there are no trips going on to 13 Street the exaction of improving the roads becomes problematic. Ms. Keys inquired if the suggestion is, we could tighten up the legalities of this; take out ththrd the north/south access; pave 13 St. SW from 27 to 43 Avenues and solve problems not only for Turtle Creek and Grovenor Estates. That would be an option she would like the Board to possibly th consider and have Attorney Collins come up with a way to tighten up, so that 13 Street SW could be paved solving the problem for the north and south communities. Ms. Keys two-storey homes addressed the matter of. She stated that Mr. Brackett had indicated that he had a problem with the restriction on two-storey homes and he understands why Planning & Zoning has requested a restriction on two-storey homes. She felt it was unfair for Mr. Brackett to be asking for a change now. Mr. Brackett, in response to Ms. Keys’ comments, said he had agreed with the recommendations, which were not approval or denial, but for her to infer that there was a conversion where he agreed to a tradeoff was incorrect. Ms. Keys recanted her inference stating Mr. Brackett is right and there was no give and take on this. There was only an agreement on a 40% build-out. George Christophertwo-storey issue , Planning & Zoning member, sees the as just the tip of an iceberg, as there are no design criteria or guidelines. He suggested that if it is approved the way it is being proposed, as a minimum, input should be required from staff. Also Mr. Brackett should be required to come back before staff with the design of these houses, how they are going to be laid out, where the setbacks are going to be and get staff to approve it. Further, the Board April 4, 2006 - 27 -