My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2 41919 <br />BOOK 41 wu 780 <br />COUNTY TO SEE IF THEY WOULD MODIFY THEIR ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT TO <br />MEET UP WITH ST. LUCIE; SECOND WOULD BE FOR ST. LUCIE TO READDRESS <br />THE SITUATION AND DETERMINE THAT ITS POINT OF EXIT, OR ENTRANCE, <br />SHOULD BE MODIFIED; THIRD WOULD BE FOR BOTH COUNTIES TO DO NOTHING <br />AND FOR THE REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL TO TAKE THE APPEAL TO THE <br />GOVERNOR AND CABINET AND ALLOW THEM TO DECIDE WHAT SHOULD BE DONE <br />WITH BASICALLY JUST THE ST, LUCIE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ORDER; THE <br />FOURTH OPTION WOULD BE FOR FP&L TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPLICATION, REFILE <br />AND START ALL OVER AGAIN; AND PERHAPS A.FIFTH OPTION WOULD BE FOR <br />THIS BOARD AND THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMMISSION TO SET UP A COMMITTEE <br />TO TAKE THIS ISSUE TO TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL TO <br />DECIDE WHETHER THE ROUTE SHOULD GO NORTH OR SOUTH, WHO SHOULD CHANGE <br />THEIR ORDER, ETC. MR. SHANNON NOTED THAT THE REGIONAL PLANNING <br />COUNCIL WOULD ONLY UNDERTAKE THIS IF BOTH COMMISSIONS INDICATED <br />THEY WOULD GIVE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION TO ANY COMPROMISE THEY MIGHT <br />RECOMMEND. HE CONTINUED THAT THE PLANNING COUNCIL STAFF COULD NOT <br />SUBSTANTIATE THAT THERE IS AN OVERRIDING REGIONAL CONCERN. THEY DO <br />FEEL THERE IS REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE SINCE THE LINE BENEFITS THE <br />PEOPLE IN THE ENTIRE AREA, BUT THE SIGNIFICANCE DOES NOT RELATE TO <br />WHETHER THE LINE GOES NORTH OR SOUTH. <br />ATTORNEY O'HAIRE WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THIS BOARD SHOULD <br />NOT BE PUT IN A POSITION OF HAVING TO CHANGE WHAT THEY HAVE ALREADY <br />DONE BECAUSE OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ORDER WHICH WAS BASED ON <br />ERRONEOUS INFORMATION. HE FELT THE MOST REASONABLE OPTION WOULD BE <br />TO TELL ST, LUCIE COUNTY THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO CHANGE OUR ORDER <br />AND INFORM THEM THAT THERE IS DEVELOPMENT NORTH OF THE TURNPIKE AND <br />THEY SHOULD RETHINK THEIR POSITION. ATTORNEY O'HAIRE STATED THAT <br />THE AFFECT ON THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT IS MORE COMPLEX THAN JUST BEING <br />ABLE TO GET DRAGLINES UNDER THE TRANSMISSION LINES; HE NOTED THAT. <br />THIS LINE IS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE MAJOR DITCHES OF THE <br />DISTRICT AND HAS THE POTENTIAL OF SERIOUSLY AFFECTING THE DISTRICT'S <br />FUNCTIONS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF ANYONE KNEW THE EXACT NATURE OF <br />THE LAND ON THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY SIDE. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.