My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
10/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:16:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SMALL AMOUNT AND THE REST BEING PUMPED NORTH, <br />NE FELT WE SOON <br />WILL HAVE TO BE IN A POSITION TO SERVE THE SOUTH COUNTY AS HE FELT <br />THE CAPACITY WILL BE USED UP NOT TOO FAR IN THE FUTURE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED PARAGRAPH 3, AND NOTED THAT <br />THE HOSPITAL HAS RELEASED 100,000 GPD OF THEIR WATER ALLOCATION, <br />AND HE BELIEVED 100,000 GPD SEWER COULD BE RELEASED, TOO. HE FELT <br />THE COUNTY COULD MAKE SOME COMMITMENT. HE STATED THAT PARAGRAPH 4 <br />DEALS WITH "MUTUALLY ADVANTAGEOUS ORDINANCES" OR A "MUTUAL AID" <br />CONCEPT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THIS ALSO PROVIDES FOR <br />MANDATORY HOOKUP. HE STATED THAT HE ASKED THE CITY IF THIS WOULD <br />BE ON A TOTALLY EQUAL BASIS FOR CITY RESIDENTS AND COUNTY RESIDENTS, <br />AND THEY SAID IT WOULD BE. <br />IN PARAGRAPH 5, IT SETS OUT THAT THE CITY WILL SET REASON- <br />ABLE RATES TO BE SET OVER INTO THEIR GENERAL FUND; THEY ALSO WILL <br />DELETE THE UTILITY TAX - ALL CUSTOMERS TO BE TREATED THE SAME. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE HAD A SERIOUS RESERVA- <br />TION - HE DID NOT LIKE THE UTILITY TAX, BUT DID NOT LIKE THIS METHOD <br />EITHER BECAUSE THE COUNTY RESIDENTS PAY AND IT GOES TO THE BENEFIT <br />OF THE CITY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS VIEWED THIS AS A CONCESSION ON THE CITY'S <br />PART. HE NOTED THEY HAVE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CHARGE EXTRA TO COUNTY <br />CUSTOMERS. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE CONTINUED TO DISCUSS THE BENEFITS THAT <br />WILL ACCRUE TO THE CITY, AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR THOMAS <br />NOTED THAT THIS IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE CITY'S BUDGET AND HAS <br />BEEN FOR MANY YEARS. DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON THIS SAME MATTER, AND <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT FELT THE CITY WOULD COMPLAIN IF WE DID THIS AT <br />THE LANDFILL, AND HE DIDN'T SEE ANY DIFFERENCE. <br />COMMISSIONER LOY DID NOT FEEL WE HAVE ANY CHOICE - THE <br />CITY HAS A SERVICE WE WANT AND NEED, AND SHE FELT THEY HAVE MADE A <br />CONCESSION TO MAKE RATES THE SAME, WHICH THEY HAVE NEVER DONE BEFORE, <br />SHE FELT IN THIS SENSE WE ARE SERVING THE COUNTY PEOPLE AND NOTED THAT <br />IF WE HAD A WATER TREATMENT PLANT, IT WOULD BE DIFFERENT, BUT WE DON'T. <br />OCT 2 41979 57 B0°K 1 fAGE 803 <br />� J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.