My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/08/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
04/08/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 10:24:32 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/08/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4018
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7233
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioners Davis, Flescher, and O'Bryan, voiced their concerns and <br />reservations over the conservation easement, and appraisals. <br />Attorney Glenn explained the logic between the parent tract value and the stand <br />alone value. <br />County Attorney Collins provided the appraisal details giving the reasons for the <br />County challenging the sale of the property, and explained the County's main objective. He felt <br />that in order to resolve the District's dispute with the Corrigans, that both the 1,256± acres of <br />District owned land, known as the Sand Lakes Track, and the 457± acres of land, owned by the <br />Corrigans, would need to be kept in conservation. He told the Board that both parties would have <br />an ownership interest, and that neither would be able to sell without the other consenting. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan endorsed the investment and stressed that it would allow for <br />future partnerships with St. Johns River Water Management District. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. <br />Fred Mensing, 7580 129th Street, Sebastian, wanted to know if there would be <br />public access to the property, and Attorney Glenn told him that the District would be legally <br />obligated to ensure public access. <br />David Cox, Periwinkle Lane, asked the Board to consider returning the proposal to <br />the Land Acquisition Advisory Committee (LAAC) so they could review it again with more <br />current information. He considered the most appropriate form of appraisal to be the stand alone, <br />and because of the current economic climate, he wanted the Board to "think long and hard" before <br />moving forward. <br />32 <br />April 8, 2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.