My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/01/2007 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
05/01/2007 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 3:16:03 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:14:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/01/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3131
Book and Page
132, 778-847
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4401
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
After lengthy discussions among the Attorneys and Board members, on whether to <br />include or exclude certain language to stipulate prevailing ordinances between municipality and <br />county, it was decided that they needed to get together and work out a simple set of language as to <br />what was required. <br /> <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner O’Bryan, SECONDED by <br />Chairman Wheeler, the Board unanimously approved to <br />direct its Legal staff to get together with Attorney Watts, <br />and the Legal staff of the Cities of Sebastian and Fellsmere, <br />to work out a simple set of language that would be <br />agreeable to all. <br /> <br />Section 1.8.2 <br /> Under (Maximum countywide building types) Attorney Watts <br />explained that this would be a second subject of county’s pre-emptive jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Attorney <br />Chairman Wheeler wanted language added that sets a maximum height. <br />Watts <br /> advised that the Board might not want to do that by Charter but by Ordinance. <br /> <br />Nancy Offutt, <br />Vero Beach,commented on prior discussions about building heights <br />and new construction and asked what about destruction, grandfathering-in, or non-conforming <br />uses. <br /> <br />Attorney Watts <br /> explained that this language is optional and they do not have to do <br />anything at all. If a grandfathering-in provision was required it could be placed in the Ordinance. <br />Chairman Wheeler asked if we could put in building heights with exceptions like we <br />currently have in our ordinances. <br /> <br />May 1, 2007 38 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.