Laserfiche WebLink
Fl - <br />N OV 211979 <br />Boa 42 PACF.131 <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A <br />PROPOSED CONTRACT DRAWN UP FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD, AND <br />WOULD LIKE TO BE SURE THAT THE FINAL RESULTS OF THIS STUDY ARE <br />INCLUDED, AND THAT WE HAVE COMPLIED WITH ALL THE STATE REGULATIONS. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON <br />AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />THE BOARD THEN ADJOURNED AT 12:00 O'CLOCK NOON AND <br />RECONVENED AT 1:30 O'CLOCK P.M. WITH THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT BROUGHT BEFORE THE BOARD A <br />REQUEST FROM DER REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT OF VISTA PROPERTIES. <br />HE EXPLAINED THAT THE STATUTES PLACES PART OF THE BURDEN ON <br />FILLING IN MARSH AREAS ON THE BOARD AND APPROVAL IS NEEDED BEFORE <br />THE PROJECT CAN GO AHEAD. THE ATTORNEY SAID THAT PRIOR TO THE <br />BOARD'S APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT MUST GO THROUGH THE DER AND GO <br />THROUGH A BIOLOGICAL STUDY; THESE DOCUMENTS MUST BE HAD BEFORE <br />THE BOARD CAN PROCEED WITH THE REQUEST. HE NOTED THAT THE PRIME <br />PURPOSE IS, PRIOR TO WETLANDS BEING FILLED, DAMAGED OR CHANGED, <br />IS THAT INPUT FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS NEEDED. THE ATTORNEY <br />ADVISED THE BOARD'S DECISION WOULD BE BASED HEAVILY ON WHAT THE <br />PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS. <br />DAVID MARSH, SENIOR PLANNER, COMMENTED THAT THEY DID <br />LOOK OVER THE APPLICATION, TALKED WITH THE APPLICANT, AND THE <br />DER. HE CONTINUED THAT THERE IS SOME ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE <br />WHICH.INDICATED THAT THE DER HAD COME TO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE <br />APPLICANT ON THE TWO SMALL AREAS WHERE THE DER WAS CONCERNED WAS <br />ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE - THOSE AREAS WILL NOT BE FILLED. <br />MR. MARSH COMMENTED THAT THEY DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON THAT BASIS, <br />AND THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO COMPLY WITH THOSE REQUESTS REGARDING <br />THE TWO SMALL SLOUGHS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS INTERJECTED THAT THE AREA IS NOT <br />PROPERLY DEFINED IN THE LETTER FROM THE DER AND WHAT THE BOARD <br />IS ASKED TO APPROVE IS NOT MENTIONED. HE SUGGESTED THAT THIS <br />BE CONTINUED UNTIL WE RECEIVE THE FINAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY <br />THAT IS INVOLVED. <br />w <br />