Laserfiche WebLink
_r <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE STATED THAT HE CEfRTAINLY UNDERSTANDS HOW <br />THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THEIR PRIVACYaAND THAT IT <br />REMAIN A PRIVATE AREA FOR THEM. HE CONTINUED THAT HE JUST COULDN'T <br />THINK OF THIS BOARD ALLOWING A MARINA TO BE BUILT IN ANY PRIVATE <br />AREA. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS AGREED THAT THIS IS A VERY FAVORABLE <br />PIECE OF PROPERTY, WHATEVER THE ZONING. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE THEN ASKED MR. BRIGGS IF HE HAD ANY SUB— <br />STANTIAL DOCUMENTATION TO SHOW THAT IT WOULD BE MORE ADVANTAGEOUS <br />TO HAVING THE PROPERTY ZONED R-3. <br />MR. BRIGGS COMMENTED THAT HOBART BROTHERS COMPANY DOES <br />RECOGNIZE THE FACT THAT ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE BUILT BEAUTIFUL <br />HOMES; THE COMPANY HAS BEEN IN THE COUNTY A GOOD MANY YEARS AND WOULD <br />NOT DO ANYTHING TO DETERIORATE THE PROPERTY. HE CONTINUED THAT ALL <br />THEY.HNVE DONE OVER THE YEARS IS BRING UP THE VALUE OF THE AREA, AS <br />THEY ARE A WORLDWIDE COMPANY AND ARE NOT TRYING TO HURT ANYTHING. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT NOTED THAT THE CANAL SYSTEM IS AN <br />INTEGRAL PART OF HOBART LANDING. <br />MR. BRIGGS STATED THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS DO NOT OWN <br />THE CHANNELS BUT HE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE REASONABLE FOR THE PROPERTY <br />OWNERS TO OBJECT IF WE WOULD COME IN FROM THE WEST AND GO PAST THEIR <br />HOMES, BUT THEY ARE NOT DOING THAT OR DISTURBING ANY ONE OF THE <br />RESIDENTS. HE AGAIN WENT ON RECORD STATING THAT THEY WON'T ALLOW <br />ANYTHING OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY TO BE DEVELOPED THERE. <br />MR. KRAFT INTERJECTED THAT WHATEVER MR. BRIGGS IS PROMISING <br />HERE IS NOT REALLY LEGAL AND BINDING, AND THAT HE STILL SUPPORTS <br />THE R-1 ZONING. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE (QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED WITH CHAIRMAN WODTKE VOTING IN OPPOSITION. <br />43 BOOK 42 PAGE 140. <br />A <br />