Laserfiche WebLink
notified Mr. Hitchcox that he was in violation of Code 9114.2.C. Mr. Hitchcox requested <br />clarification as to how he could come into compliance. <br /> <br />Administrator Baird responded that staff would meet with Mr. Hitchcox to get a <br />concise understanding of what his violation was and see if he could get it corrected, but there was <br />a distinct process that he must go through, via Code Enforcement and Planning. Bob Keating, <br />Community Development Director, advised that there was going to be an evidentiary hearing <br />between Mr. Hitchcox and the Code Enforcement Board on Monday, May 21, 2007. <br /> <br />Roland DeBlois, Environmental & Code Enforcement Chief, explained that on Mr. <br />Hitchcox’s property, which must be split into two distinct parcels, there can only be two mobile <br />homes, and it was up to the Code Enforcement Board to determine whether a violation existed. <br /> <br />Chairman Wheeler reiterated that Mr. Hitchcox needed to go through the Code <br />Enforcement Board. Attorney Collins added that Mr. Hitchcox could appeal to the Circuit Court if <br />he was unhappy with the decision made by Code Enforcement, which would be bestowed after <br />Code Enforcement heard both sides of the issue. <br /> <br />NO BOARD ACTION REQUIRED OR TAKEN <br /> <br />9.C. PUBLICNOTICEITEMS <br /> <br />TH <br />9.C.1. NSPHM22,2007:27D <br />OTICE OF CHEDULED UBLIC EARING AY RIVE <br />TH <br />PWS(N4S),IR <br />ETITION ATER ERVICE ORTH OF TREET NDIAN IVER <br />CPN.UCP-2906(A) <br />OUNTY ROJECT O DMINISTRATIVE <br />The Chairman read the notice into the record. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />May 15, 2007 11 <br /> <br />