12/5/1979 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Fl - DEC 51979 . 'I BOOK 42 PACE 204 ATTORNEY COLLINS DISCUSSED WITH THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING MINOR SITE PLAN APPROVALS AND NOTED THERE ALSO IS SOME ADDITIONAL CRITERIA INCLUDED DEFINING WHEN THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE WILL BECOME INVOLVED WITH SITE PLAN APPROVALS. HE REVIEWED THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED IN 1, 2 AND 3 FOR THE MINOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL, AND EXPLAINED THAT IN THE EVENT THE APPLICANT AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONCUR, THEN THAT ITEM IS PUT ON THE ZONING COMMISSION'S AGENDA ALONG WITH OTHERS OF A SIMILAR TYPE AND GIVEN BLANKET APPROVAL WITHOUT FURTHER DISCUSSION UNLESS THE ZONING COMMIS- SION DECIDES IT WISHES TO REVIEW THAT PARTICULAR ITEM. IN THE EVENT THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE APPLICANT, THEN THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO GO BEFORE THE ZONING COMMISSION AS A SPECIAL MATTER. THE INTENTION IS TO SPEED UP CONSIDERATION OF MINOR ITEMS. THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDED A RIGHT OF APPEAL THROUGH NORMAL SITE PLAN APPEAL PROCEDURE. CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF THIS IS SAYING THAT 24 MULTIPLE FAMILY UNITS WOULD BE A MINOR ITEM. ATTORNEY COLLINS POINTED OUT THAT THERE ARE TWO SEPARATE SECTIONS - MINOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND ADDITIONAL CRITERIA. THE ADDITIONAL CRITERIA PROPOSED SUGGESTS THAT 24 UNITS OR LESS WOULD NOT GO THROUGH THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT MANY ITEMS NOW DO NOT GO TO THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE UNLESS THE ADMINISTRATOR FEELS IT IS NECESSARY; THIS IS JUST TO ESTABLISH CERTAIN CRITERIA. CHAIRMAN WODTKE WAS OF THE OPINION THAT WITH THIS SPECIFIC LIMIT, PEOPLE WOULD DELIBERATELY FALL SHORT OF THE NUMBER TO AVOID THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE. SENIOR PLANNER MARSH NOTED THAT THE TECHNICAL REVIEW COM- MITTEE DOES NOT REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE DETAIL THAN IN THE REGULAR SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION PROCESS,'IT JUST CAUSES SOME TIME DELAY, IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT ITEM 2 UNDER ADDITIONAL CRITERIA STATES THAT MOBILE HOME PARKS OR SUBDIVISIONS 26