My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
12/5/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:14:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC 51979 42 -PAGE 242 <br />NOT TO EXCEED 10,000 GALLONS PER DAY, WHICH HE WAS SURE IS ADEQUATE <br />FOR THEIR PURPOSE. HE FELT THE SEWER SITUATION IS SOLVABLE. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS - <br />SIGNER SIEBERT)TO AUTHORIZE THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT TO ACCEPT THE <br />APPLICATION OF -FLORIDA LIVING CARE FOR WATER CONNECTION TO THE <br />RALMAR LINE, NOT TO EXCEED 10,000 GALLONS PER DAY, THE CONNECTION <br />TO BE AT THEIR EXPENSE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT HE HAS TO GO BACK AND CHECK <br />THE BOUNDARY TO BE SURE IT IS INCLUDED IN THE BOUNDARY WE DESCRIBE <br />BECAUSE IF IT IS NOT, IT WOULD REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE GAVE ATTORNEY <br />COOKSEY THE BOUNDARY INVOLVED IN RALMAR AND ALSO GAVE IT TO THE <br />PRINCIPAL OF FLORIDA LIVING CARE, AND HE SAID HIS PROPERTY DOES LIE <br />WITHIN THESE BOUNDARIES. HE STATED THAT HE WAS WILLING TO MAKE <br />THIS PART OF THE MOTION, BUT THE ATTORNEY DID NOT FEEL THIS WAS <br />NECESSARY. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN LOY ASKED IF THE SERVING OF WATER IS CONTINGENT <br />UPON THEIR RECEIVING SEWER FROM RALMAR, AND COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED <br />THAT HE DID NOT MAKE IT THAT WAY SINCE THERE IS ALWAYS THE POSSIBILITY <br />THAT THEY COULD GET A PACKAGE PLANT IF THEY HAD TO. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAD MET WITH THE CITY AND <br />DID NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE WILL BE A PROBLEM WITH SEWER. HE AGREED <br />THERE IS ALWAYS THE POSSIBILITY OF A PACKAGE PLANT. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THERE IS ANY POSSIBILITY THAT <br />THE CITY HAS A LEGAL INTEREST IN WHETHER OR NOT WE MAKE THIS ALLOCA- <br />TION TO THE HOOK-UP. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE HAS TAKEN THEā¢.POSITION THAT <br />IT WAS AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S PART TO SERVE. ON THE OTHER HAND, <br />HE BELIEVED THEY HAVE EFFECTIVELY, THROUGH THEIR MINUTES, WAIVED ANY <br />RIGHTS THEY MAY HAVE AND HAVE FIRMLY PLACED THE PROBLEM IN THE <br />COUNTY'S HANDS AND TOLD THEM TO RESOLVE IT IF THEY DESIRED. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO GIVE <br />AN ALLOCATION THAT THE CITY WOULD OBJECT TO AND GET INVOLVED IN A <br />LAWSUIT. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.