My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/19/2009 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05/19/2009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2020 12:13:10 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:21:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/19/2009
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4027
Book and Page
137,410-461
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7341
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Penny Chandler, Indian River County Chamber of Commerce, spoke about the punch <br />list and said we need to focus on making sure that when staff presents it, that all relevant <br />departments approve that certificate and that everything is up front, and it would not return <br />before the Board because someone missed something. <br />Brian Carman, Executive Director of the Indian River Neighborhood Association <br />(IRNA), said the Association has no problem with the ordinance as written; they think it is a <br />good idea; they applaud the Commission for taking leadership, and acknowledged the "great <br />staff' the Board has. He said perception is reality, in the public's eye, so a little more <br />transparency should be exercised when exceptions are made, in the form of notice to those <br />usually affected. <br />Administrator Baird addressing comments regarding notice, admitted it is important that <br />there should be full disclosure. Commissioner O'Bryan preferred to see items of this nature <br />placed under Item 7, "Informational" items, on the Agenda. <br />Jens Tripson, Vero Beach, said he was a little confused, because this came before the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission, they worked on it and sent it back, and he wanted to know if <br />the Board was now saying they were not going to use the Board of Adjustments (BOA), but it <br />would come before the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) instead. He pointed out the <br />specific professional makeup of the BOA versus the BCC, remarking that if we go the route of <br />the BCC it adds that level of bureaucracy we do not need; therefore we need to stick to the BOA. <br />Commissioner Wheeler reiterated his belief that subject matters should come back to <br />BCC and they could have a Special Call meeting, if necessary. He said the main thing is we are <br />going outside our ordinances and giving some additional assistance to developers. He also <br />believed it was better that the elected Board make those decision and be accountable for them <br />rather than an appointed Board doing it. <br />May 19, 2009 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.