My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/23/2006 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
05/23/2006 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:16:50 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/23/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3123
Book and Page
130, 794-810
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
310
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />impact fees paid within 60 days of site approval. The other three counties do not require the <br />fees be paid until the approval of building permits. They also account for the concurrency <br />when the DO is issued, they do not wait for the building permit. <br /> <br /> <br />7. PUBLIC COMMENTS <br /> <br />Bruce Barkett <br />, 156 Beachland Blvd., agreed with Administrator Baird to allow the <br />impact fees to be paid at the time of approving the land development permit (LDP). If all the <br />Mr. Barkett <br />money is not paid up front felt you can still plan. If you make them pay their <br />impact fees, or at least bond them out at a time-certain, you know their money is on the line, <br />and they are going to build their project. <br /> <br />Bob Swift <br />, 6450 Glendale, related that when he plans a development project he <br />plans for the next three to five years. He suggested the County should use a similar system. <br />With the background traffic data, coupled with the surety bond or letter of credit, the County <br />would know when they come on-line and when they would get paid for it. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding Mr. Swift’s suggestion and Administrator Baird <br />indicated it could be done if the developers would do their projects in phases. <br /> <br /> Donna Keys, <br />Chairmanliked the idea of paying impact fees in phases. <br /> <br />Brian Stewart, Esq., <br /> Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart PA, suggested tying it into the <br />Capital Improvement Plan. <br /> <br />MAY 23, 2006 <br />9 <br />JOINT WORKSHOP P&Z/BCC <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.