Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 191979 <br />BOOK 4 FACE 384 <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT THEY HAVE TENTATIVE APPROVAL <br />ON THE PIECE OF PROPERTY AS A WHOLE, AND THEY WOULD HAVE TO SEE IF <br />THE PIECE THEY WANTED TO PLAT WOULD STAND ON ITS OWN OR NOT. HE <br />SUGGESTED THE BOARD DISCUSS PINE CREST I AND PINE CREST II. HE STATED <br />THAT HE IS CONCERNED THAT WE REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE WAY WE GRANTED <br />TENTATIVE APPROVAL BEFORE. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED IF EVERYTHING HAS BEEN THROUGH <br />SUBDIVISION REVIEW, AND THE CHAIRMAN STATED THAT IT HAS, BUT HE BELIEVED <br />WE WILL HAVE TO CHANGE A FEW NOTES ON THE PLAT. <br />MR. MARSH ASKED IF YOU NORMALLY HAVE TO HAVE FRANCHISE <br />APPROVAL BEFORE TENTATIVE APPROVAL, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT <br />IDEALLY, THE TWO GO TOGETHER. HE DID NOT FEEL IT HAS TO BE SIMUL- <br />TANEOUS IN THIS CASE SINCE IT IS JUST AN EXPANSION, BUT USUALLY IT <br />IS. YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING TO EXPAND A FRANCHISE. THIS <br />DEVELOPER HAS ALREADY RECEIVED A FRANCHISE WITH THE TERMS OF THE <br />COUNTY'S NEW FRANCHISE FORM. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY GRANTED TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO PINE <br />CREST SUBDIVISION, UNIT II, CONDITIONED UPON A WATER FRANCHISE BEING <br />ISSUED TO THE DEVELOPER UNDER THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS THE <br />PREVIOUS FRANCHISE ISSUED ON PINE CREST SUBDIVISION, UNIT I, OTHER- <br />WISE KNOWN AS MITCHELL ESTATES, AND UPON MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES <br />IN THE NOTES ON THE PLAT REFERRING TO TREASURE COAST UTILITIES. <br />SENIOR PLANNER MARSH REVIEWED A RIGHT-OF-WAY ABANDONMENT <br />IN INDIAN RIVER HEIGHTS REQUESTED BY ROBERT GALE, AS PER HIS FOLLOWING <br />MEMO OF DECEMBER LOTH: <br />79 <br />m <br />m <br />