My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/03/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
05/03/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:19:29 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/03/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3098
Book and Page
130, 676-687
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
304
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Director Keating responded that by executing the Interlocal Agreement each <br />municipality will be taking on a major part of the system. The two major responsibilities are the <br />School Board will make sure the supply is there (build schools), and the cities will make sure the <br />demand is met. <br />Director Keating said the purpose of this meeting was to get those responsible both <br />Boards together, receive input, and together try to resolve it at staff level. He pointed out the <br />Interlocal Agreement has specifics regarding how to change the school service area boundaries <br />and the Public School Facility Plan. The Cities and the County have essential veto authority over <br />the School Board’s decisions to making unilateral changes. <br />Commissioner Wheeler wanted to know whether the School Board or the County decides <br />what is to be developed. Director Keating said both; the School Board gets to weigh in if the Cities <br />or the County wants to make any changes to their Comprehensive Plan. This agreement mandates <br />that the School Board would have to keep up with supplying the school seats necessary to meet the <br />demand and to maintain the level of service. This is the only aspect of concurrency mandated by <br />the State where you have different governmental bodies responsible for supply and demand. The <br />Interlocal Agreement is essentially setting responsibilities on both parties. <br />Dr. McIntyre <br /> felt there was plenty of time to massage these issues and to address <br />everyone’s concerns before the final draft. <br /> <br />Councilmember Coy <br /> would like to see more participation considered at all levels so <br />everyone reaches a comfort zone. She asked that the School Board consider the City input in the <br />future when decisions are being made regarding the boundaries. <br /> <br />Damien Gillium <br />, Sebastian, wanted to know who controls the money. Director Keating <br />said the local government that is issuing the building permit collects the impact fees. The County <br />transfers the impact fees to the School Board and they have to provide to the County every year <br />where impact fees are being spent, to ensure they are being spent appropriately. <br /> <br />May 3, 2006 <br />7 <br />School Concurrency Workshop Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.