My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/31/2006
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
05/31/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 11:21:20 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:01:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Joint Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/31/2006
Archived Roll/Disk#
3123
Book and Page
130, 812-829
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
311
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />taxes and get 4% of the service. He also felt the County gets a good tax benefit from the barrier <br />islands and thinks they deserve to have nice beaches. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler, to get a clearer understanding of electricity charges for City and <br />County utility usage, presented a scenario on two lighthouses, one on City Street and one in the <br />County. <br /> <br />Mr. Maillet <br />responded that if the actual electric portion were, say, for a City resident came <br />to $200.00 then the County resident would be $220.00. The City resident would be $200.00 plus <br />$20.00 of the City utility tax for a bill of $220.00 and the County resident would pay the $220.00 in <br />Mr. Maillet <br />electric, a zero percent. agreed with Commissioner Wheeler that the bills would be <br />identical for the same amount of kilowatt-hours used. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler asked Administrator Baird to clarify whether the County funds its <br />parks out of the General Fund or the MSTU. <br /> <br />Administrator Baird explained. The County funds its recreation, and $1.318M of that is for <br />lifeguards for its five (5) parks and that comes out of the MSTU. Some of the County’s park <br />maintenance also comes out of the general fund. Mr. Baird commented that (1) the County never <br />took a dime for North County Park from anything but County’s optional sales tax, which COVB <br />got theirs and County got its share. None of it came from ad valorem taxes from City of Vero <br />Beach. (2) That COVB was assuming that anyone who does not live in the City is a County <br />resident and that was wrong, because they are tourists and from others cities as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler had further questions. He asked, “on the jail, this comes out of the <br />general fund because it’s used by everybody; the law enforcement side of the sheriff’s budget <br />comes out of the MSTU because the City is providing their own protection. If all the cities have <br />their own parks, why wouldn’t our funding for our maintenance of parks come out of the MSTU <br />instead of our general funds?” <br />May 31, 2006 <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.