My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/04/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
05/04/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:27:55 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:03:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/04/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2927
Book and Page
126, 909-963
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
421
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />issuance of a land development permit, the applicant will be required to obtain from IRFWCD a <br />th <br />dedication of the 25 Street SW right-of-way. <br />rd <br /> Commissioner Lowther questioned the additional traffic which would be routed onto 43 <br />Avenue, and Director Boling gave a brief explanation of the proposed new north-south road for <br />use by all the developments in this master planned area in an effort to keep some of the trips off the <br />major roadways in that area. <br /> Director Boling continued that this north-south road will also connect the whole area to the <br />proposed school and park properties. <br /> Commissioner Macht felt that the County is being short-changed and is giving more than <br />it is receiving. <br /> Discussion ensued regarding paving of the roads in the area, as well as landscaping to be <br />required. <br />th <br /> Chairman Ginn referred to Page 132 of the backup regarding the 25 Street improvements <br />and noted that she would prefer it to read “bridge replacement” rather than improvement. It should <br />be understood that no County funds or impact fee credits will be used. <br /> <br /> The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard with <br />regard to this matter. <br /> <br />Brian Heady <br /> questioned the proposed school and park sites and emphasized that those <br />sites are not a part of this project. He felt that every new project should be required to dedicate at <br />least a 2-acre park site. <br />MAY 4, 2004 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.