Laserfiche WebLink
Vice Chairman Davis believed the big issues needed to be addressed before <br />accepting the study. <br />Director Keating clarified the direction of the Board, confirmed that staff would deal <br />with the School District, and develop the Scope of Services (should the cost fall under <br />Administrator Baird's authority) so Administrator Baird could approve the study, and staff could <br />more forward. He felt that in order to differentiate commercial impact fees in terms of how much <br />demand is being created, that a traffic consultant would need to conduct a study. Thereafter, he <br />acknowledged that this would take a number of months before it could be brought back to the <br />Board. <br />There was a brief discussion pertaining to why the report was not accepted, the item <br />coming back to the Board under the Consent Agenda, and whether it would fall under the <br />Competitive Negotiation Act. <br />Commissioner Wheeler and Vice Chairman Davis requested that when this comes <br />back to the Board that it be restricted to addressing specific points and issues. <br />Administrator Baird said that since the study was not accepted, the School Board <br />could only decide if they want to move ahead with their current impact fees. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Vice Chairman Davis, the Board unanimously directed staff <br />to obtain clarification from the School Board by vote. <br />At the request of Joseph Paladin, Commissioner Wheeler explained that he wanted <br />to see commercial and industrial impact fees reduced by 15% from the point where they are <br />currently. <br />12 <br />May 9, 2008 <br />Special Call <br />