My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/09/2008 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2008
>
05/09/2008 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 3:49:05 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:18:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting Impact Fees
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/09/2008
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4019
Subject
Impact Fees
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7241
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
County Administrator Joe Baird summarized staff's position, and emphasized that <br />due to the current economy, impact fees should not be increased. He recommended the Board <br />accept the study, eliminate the solid waste and library impact fees, and not increase the impact fees <br />at this time. He expressed that if the impact fees were increased right now, it would slow the <br />community's economy even further. <br />The Commissioners voiced their concerns and the particulars of what they wanted to <br />see in the report. <br />Clancy Mullen, Consultant from Duncan Associates, Administrator Baird, and <br />Director Keating addressed the Board's questions regarding land and construction costs; fees and <br />credits as they relate to impact fees; credits for principal repayment and capacity expanding <br />improvements; and ad valorem bond issues pertaining to construction. <br />Mr. Mullen briefly highlighted portions of his Impact Fee Update using a Power <br />Point presentation (copy on file). He divulged that the basic factor for increasing fees is that costs <br />have gone up. He pointed out that no changes had been made to the formula, and that the same <br />travel demand characteristics that had come out of the previous study were used for the calibrated <br />trip lengths. He said they calibrated the travel demand for each land use, and reduced it by 24.1 %, <br />to account for the fact that there was not as much travel on the roadways as originally predicted by <br />the generation rates. Mr. Mullen recapped the ratio of fees by County, as it pertained to <br />non-residential versus residential fees; and informed the Board that Indian River County is in line <br />with its neighboring Counties. He clarified the alternative revenue neutral fees, and the percent of <br />maximum fees that the Board could adopt. <br />There was a brief discussion regarding donated land, the details of moving Osceola <br />Magnet School, and increasing core capacity. <br />3 <br />May 9, 2008 <br />Special Call <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.