My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/13/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
6/13/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 2:31:14 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
PD Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/13/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Other
Archived Roll/Disk#
2570
Book and Page
125, 478-492
Subject
Planning & Zoning Commission on Planned Developments
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
499
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Neuberger felt this was one of the major differences between planned <br />developments and subdivisions. <br />Director Keating agreed, explaining that swales are placed in an attempt to maximize the <br />density. If you put in a centralized stormwater tract and don't put in smaller lots you are going to <br />have a smaller yield. <br />Chairman Macht commented that they have every reason to believe that Heron Crest is <br />going to be a nice subdivision. <br />Bob Denton, 11245 Roseland Road, Sebastian, expressed concern when institutions or <br />non -profits use planned developments. They increase the density tremendously, impact the use <br />of the property in pseudo commercial uses, and impact the neighborhood. He felt that there is a <br />possibility that this could happen in our county and believed it should be looked into. <br />Norman Hensick, Jr., 425 3211d Avenue SW, a member of the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission, representing himself, referred to Mary Knauer's discussion regarding Heron Crest <br />Subdivision and the swales. He developed several subdivisions with swales along SW 5th Street <br />before the stormwater retention areas existed. Those subdivisions are very nice and do hold <br />water when they have a storm event. He thought the concern was overstated and he didn't <br />believe there would be a problem having it in the ordinance. <br />Bob Swift, 6450 Glendale Road, said one of the concerns he heard has been the lot sizes. <br />He provided a handout displaying what he uses to evaluate property to determine economic <br />viability. Regulations require the developer to provide adequate stormwater retention areas and <br />open spaces and he feels that the County needs to give something in return. He expressed the <br />need to find a way to sustain good developments with flexibility. <br />Chip Landers, 1636 51St Court, a realtor, said lot sizes are really not a factor unless it is <br />affordable housing and the smaller lot sizes are in demand. Waterford Lakes has the highest <br />JUNE 13, 2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.