My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/13/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
6/13/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 2:31:14 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
PD Workshop
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/13/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Other
Archived Roll/Disk#
2570
Book and Page
125, 478-492
Subject
Planning & Zoning Commission on Planned Developments
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
499
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
yield. They are nowhere near the number of lots they could have if they were to maximize the <br />development. <br />Chairman Macht referenced Mr. Swift's formula regarding stormwater and open space <br />regulations downsizing lot space. He said the density is stated when the PD is approved. Based <br />on Mr. Swift's formula, if accurate, he asked to hear what to expect under a standard subdivision <br />to get an idea of the alternative. <br />Director Boling responded that developers could easily get 3 units per acre and have a <br />central stormwater system. He referenced three RS -6 zoned areas as examples: Walkers Glen <br />built out at 3.1 units per acre; Falcon Trace built out at 2.15 units per acre; and Compass Point <br />built out at 2.9 units per acre. He said there is little difference between RS -6 density and RS -3. <br />Heron Crest zoned RS -3 is built out at 2.6 units per acre. <br />Jim Kern from Homestead, Florida, commended the Commissioners for taking time to <br />hold the workshop. He pointed out that our County is definitely below the numbers of real estate <br />usage designated over 60 years by the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Master <br />Plan. He said it is impossible to meet those densities without going vertical. He asked the Board <br />to keep in mind smaller properties versus larger ones are going to have other criteria such as <br />density, wetlands, trees, etc., and as long as staff and the community have the same objective he <br />was very optimistic. <br />Richard Baker, 522 North Blue Island Lane, Sebastian, had a concern regarding density <br />and questioned if we should follow the Comp Plan what the future population of Indian River <br />County would be. <br />Director Keating replied that a general estimate of the build out in the urban service area <br />would be around 250,000, about double the current population. Every time we have a <br />development the population estimate goes down. Five years ago it may have been higher, but <br />when you build out less densities than allowed the central population estimate goes down. <br />JUNE 13, 2003 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.