My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/9/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
1/9/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:51 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:18:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/09/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAN, 91980 <br />eoOK 4 PAGE 4;34 <br />THE BOARD NEXT DISCUSSED A LETTER RECEIVED FROM LEWIS <br />GREENE, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY OF VERO BEACH, REQUESTING <br />JOINT CITY -COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN CLEANOUT OF A CANAL THAT DRAINS <br />A PART OF ROCKRIDGE SUBDIVISION. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT THE MAP ATTACHED IS <br />ERRONEOUS AND MR. GREENE IS NO LONGER ASKING FOR PARTICIPATION ON <br />THE WHOLE THING - JUST AT THE SOUTH END OF THE CANAL AT 15TH 'FTREET <br />AND 3RD AVENUE WHERE IT GOES DUE EAST INTO THE INDIAN RIVER. HE <br />STATED THAT JOHN AMOS OF THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT HAS AGREED TO FURNISH <br />MARL OFF THE NORTH RELIEF CANAL BANK TO THE CITY AND COUNTY. THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT WHILE THE COUNTY HAS NO ACTUAL RESPONSIBILITY <br />IN THIS, IF THE CANAL DOES BECOME BLOCKED, IT WILL HAVE A TENDENCY TO <br />FLOOD THE ROCKRIDGE AREA AND THEN IT WOULD BECOME THE COUNTY'S RE- <br />SPONSIBILITY. THE ADMINISTRATOR SUGGESTED THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER <br />AUTHORIZING HIM TO DO THIS WORK WITH THE CITY AND REMOVE THE TRASH <br />TREES. HE CONTINUED THAT MR. GREENE HAS CHECKED WITH THE FORESTER, <br />WHO HAS AGREED THE TREES CAN COME OUT. THE CITY WILL TAKE THE <br />RESPONSIBILITY, AND WE CAN SEND DOWN A DRAGLINE AND A DOZER AND <br />POSSIBLY SOME TRUCKS. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS COMMENTED THAT THERE ARE SOME GOOD OAK <br />TREES IN THIS AREA. HE NOTED THAT THE CITY HAS A GOOD TREE PROTEC- <br />TION ORDINANCE, AND IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT MR. GREENE SAYS HE <br />GOT CLEARANCE FROM THE FORESTER, THE FORESTER HAS NOTHING TO SAY <br />ABOUT IT: IT WILL REQUIRE A TREE REMOVING PERMIT. <br />ADMINISTRATOR JENNING COMMENTED THAT MR. GREENE DID SAY <br />THAT UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WOULD THEY MOVE ANY OAK TREES - ONLY <br />PEPPER TREES AND SOME AUSTRALIAN PINES. MR. GREENE ALSO SAID THEY <br />WOULD TAKE CARE OF THE NECESSARY PERMITTING. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LYONS, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER WODTKE, THAT THE COUNTY PARTICIPATE IN THE CLEARANCE OF THIS <br />- CANAL AND REMOVAL OF TREES AS REQUESTED BY MR. GREENE ON THE CONDI- <br />TION THAT ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, INCLUDING TREE REMOVAL PERMITS, ARE <br />SECURED BY THE CITY OF VERO BEACH. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.