Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />JAN 91980 <br />eam 42 PAcE 472 <br />ATTORNEY HENDERSON COMMENTED THAT MR. HATALA WANTS TO <br />DEVELOP NOW BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE INTERESTED IN COMING IN WITH INDUS <br />TRIAL TYPE USES. HE POINTED OUT THAT M-1 CALLS FOR SITE PLAN <br />APPROVAL AND FELT IT IS CLEAR THAT THERE IS A LACK OF MARKETABLE <br />AND READILY AVAILABLE INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVIDED LOTS IN THIS COUNTY, <br />AND MR. HATALA IS ATTEMPTING TO MEET THIS NEED. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED IF ANYONE PRESENT WISHED TO BE HEARD. <br />ATTORNEY SAM BLOCK CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING ABOUT <br />40 CONCERNED CITIZENS WHO OPPOSE THE REZONING AND PRESENTED A PETITION <br />SIGNED BY THEM, HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT MOST OF THESE INDIVIDUALS <br />HAVE BOUGHT ACREAGE RATHER THAN LOTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOMES, AND <br />THEY, OF COURSE, SUPPORT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN SAYING THAT ANY <br />REZONING TO M-1 IS PREMATURE. ATTORNEY BLOCK POINTED OUT THAT UNDER <br />THE M-1 ZONING THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 14 PERMITTED USES THAT MUST <br />BE ALLOWED IF THEY COMPLY WITH THE SITE PLAN APPROVALS, I.E., ICE <br />PLANTS, RETAIL AND WHOLESALE SELLING OF GOODS, JUNK AND SALVAGE YARDS, <br />ETC. HE CONTINUED THAT MR. HATALA ALREADY HAS 660` HE CAN DEVELOP, <br />AND HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THERE IS NO EXISTING INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE <br />SUBJECT AREA AT THIS TIME. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT INSTRUCTED THAT THE PETITION AND ATTACHED <br />LETTER SUBMITTED BY ATTORNEY BLOCK BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES, <br />AND THEY ARE HEREBY MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES AS FOLLOWS: <br />