Laserfiche WebLink
January 3,, 1980 <br />MEMO <br />TO: <br />Indian <br />River <br />Board <br />of County <br />Commissioners <br />FROM: <br />Indian <br />River <br />County <br />Planning <br />Department <br />SUBJECT: Request to resubdivide Lots 1 and 7 of Orange Terrace and report <br />on the effect of resubdividing of the remaining lots of the same <br />subdivision <br />In accordance with Section 22-62 of County Ordinance 75-3, the applicant is <br />asking for resubdivision of Lots 1 and 7 in Orange Terrace,a recorded sub- <br />division in the county. The applicant has submitted plans for that resub- <br />division to the County Planning Department for review and recommendation as <br />requested by the County Commission. <br />Review of the proposal indicates that most of the physical changes necessary <br />to accomplish the new lot configuration have been incorporated into the plan. <br />Such improvements include: <br />1) Providing indirect access to 6th Avenue from Lots lA and 7A via <br />14th and 13th. Streets respectively. <br />2) Indicating a 10' non -access easement parallel to 6th Avenue on <br />all lots facing that road. <br />3) Showing the use and location of culverts'in the driveway access <br />to the properties involved. <br />Conversely the division of the lots are not as proportionally equal as they <br />could be. Lots 1 and lA could be 110' x 140' and 110' x 135' instead of the <br />measurements shown and still meet _the zoning requirements,accommodating 4 units <br />on Lot 1 and 3 units on Lot 1A. The same is true for Lots 7 and 7A where lots <br />of equal size can each support 4 units and meet all other zoning criteria. <br />The driveways shown on the plan should actually be constructed as half streets <br />for the entire length of Lots lA and 7A, with entrances providing access from <br />the street. <br />While the physical requirements for accomplishing this proposal have been <br />addressed, there are other considerations to be dealt with here. The ordinance <br />states that the new lots created should be consistent with the other lots in <br />the subdivision. while the proposed design would be balanced along 6th Avenue, <br />the new lots are not consistent with the remaining lots. <br />DAVID M. REVER • DIRECTOR <br />2121 14T' -+AVE. VERO BEACH, FL 32960 • 305/567-5142 <br />JAN 9 X980 81 roc- $2 _eacF 407„ <br />