1/9/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LOTS I -N THE SUBDIVISION ARE OWNED BY THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPERS, AND HE ACTS AS TRUSTEE FOR THE OWNER OF LOT 9 AND HAS A LETTER FROM HIM SUPPORTING SUBDIVIDING OF THE LOTS AS REQUESTED. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED -'THAT THE ORDINANCE DOES CALL FOR WRITTEN NOTICE. HE BROUGHT UP THE UTILITY ASPECT OF THIS SITUATION, NOTING THAT THE BOARD PASSED A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THAT ANY DEVELOPMENT OF FOUR UNITS OR MORE HAD TO HAVE A CENTRAL WATER SUPPLY, AND THE REASON FOR THIS WAS TO HAVE THE ABILITY TO METER THE SEWAGE. THE ATTORNEY CONTINUED THAT, AS HE UNDERSTANDS IT, MR. ZORC'S PROJECT, EVEN IF THE LOTS WERE DIVIDED, WOULD HOOK ONTO THE FORCE MAIN, BUT STILL WOULD HAVE WELLS; THEREFORE, BY APPROVING THE DIVISION OF THE LOTS, THE BOARD WOULD BE APPROVING WELLS AND WOULD HAVE TO DETERMINE A METHOD OF MONITORING THE SEWAGE FLOW, HE FELT THAT ALTHOUGH THIS IS NOT THE DIRECT ISSUE, IT IS QUITE MATERIAL. COMMISSIONER WODTKE ASKED MR. ZORC IF THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE A SEWAGE FLOW METER ON EACH LOT, AND MR. ZORC BELIEVED THEY WOULD. RELIABLE. ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT IS VERY EXPENSIVE AND NOT TOO MR. ZORC STATED THAT HE HAS A PARTY WHO WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A DUPLEX AND A FOUR-PLEX ON ONE LOT, AND HE COULD PROBABLY DO IT LEGALLY RIGHT NOW WITHOUT ANY DIVISION OF THE LOT, BUT HE WANTS THE OWNERSHIP TO BE DIVIDED BETWEEN HIMSELF AND HIS SON; THEREFORE, HE MADE THE REQUEST TO HAVE THE LOT DIVIDED SO HE CAN BUY ONE PORTION AND HIS SON BUY THE OTHER. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THE REAL REASON HE WANTS TO DO THAT IS HE WANTS TO PUT WELLS DOWN AND DOESNIT WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN A CENTRAL WATER SYSTEM. ROBERT-CUMMINGS, INVESTOR IN ORANGE TERRACE, COMMENTED THAT THE IDEAL SITUATION WOULD BE TO HAVE MUNICIPAL WATER IN THE AREA. HE NOTED THERE IS A COUNTY LINE RUNNING DOWN SIXTH AVENUE AND ASKED IF THE COUNTY DOESN'T HAVE SOME WATER AVAILABLE THAT CAN BE USED IN THIS AREA. It JAN 9 19 0 83 BOOK, 42 PACE 499