Laserfiche WebLink
Attorney Vitunac <br /> responded to questions posed by MayorWhite regarding <br />Fellsmere’s Reserve area. <br />Dale Simchick <br />, Sebastian Council Member, asserted that the elected officials <br />needed to address their concerns regarding the Fellsmere and Sebastian reserve areas before <br />further progress could be made on the Interlocal Agreement. <br />Mr. Nunemaker <br />reminded everyone that the primary reason for the Interlocal <br />Agreement had been to supplant the Charter that was offered, in addressing issues such as <br />annexation and height densities. He conveyed that Fellsmere had an open mind as far as <br />providing services. <br />(B) THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND REGULATIONS <br />(LDR’s) FOR THE LAND ANNEXED BY FELLSMERE <br />Mr. Nunemaker <br /> pointed out that there was a town policy which the County <br />allowed in unincorporated areas, with certain provisions. But he felt that the level of specificity <br />requested by the County was to the point of micromanaging Fellsmere’s development. Mr. <br />Nunemaker believed that some type of compromise could be reached. <br />Director Keating related that when negotiations began on the ISBA, Fellsmere had <br />established that the Agreement would not have any influence on how the areas already annexed <br />could be developed, but they later agreed to come up with some development standards that <br />would be put into the ISBA. Director Keating deemed that the standards are insufficient to <br />ensure those areas are developed in a way that will not result in urban sprawl. He thereafter used <br />11 <br />June 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Jt. Mtng/Interlocal Agrmnt <br /> <br />