Laserfiche WebLink
(C) SEBASTIAN’S 4,000 ACRE RESERVE AREA <br />Director Keating explained that the draft ISBA would exempt development in the <br />Sebastian Reserve Area from a rule of the Agreement which requires unanimous approval by all <br />parties for any land use changes. Instead, Sebastian has come up with development standards to <br />serve in lieu of the unanimous requirement. Director Keating used a PowerPoint (copy on file) <br />to depict Sebastian’s development standards (Sebastian’s Special Planning Area), and to outline <br />the County’s concerns regarding those standards. <br />Sebastian City Attorney Rich Stringer <br />provided details on Sebastian’s Special <br />Planning Area, and reiterated the need to have an office park and employment center. Attorney <br />Stringer noted that the job producing environment would have to occur before new residential <br />development. <br />Mayor White <br /> asked Attorney Stringer if each municipality could obtain a copy of <br />Sebastian’s Special Planning Area. He asked that Sebastian keep alternatives in mind, such that <br />the ISBA can be completed and agreed upon by all parties. <br />5. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS - ELECTED OFFICIALS <br />Commissioner O’Bryan pointed out that the County had a fourth area of concern <br />not placed on today’s agenda. Under Section 15, Item B, it states that if the County, or even a <br />citizen, initiates a Charter process, the ISBA would become null and void. Commissioner <br />O’Bryan explained that issues other than height and density might arise which would provide <br />sufficient cause to implement Charter, and he felt that Section 15.B. should be removed from the <br />Agreement, or debated. <br />13 <br />June 19, 2008 <br />Special Call Jt. Mtng/Interlocal Agrmnt <br /> <br />