Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />10. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR’S MATTERS <br />10.A. WCRC,LLC“HOD <br />ORLD HANGERS AND EGATTA ONSTRUCTION OUSE IN NE AY <br />CP”LDFS(17H,J8-17, <br />HARITY ROJECT ANDFILL ISPOSAL EES UBSIDY OMES ULY <br />2006) <br /> <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Wheeler, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Davis, the Board unanimously approved the <br />payment of landfill disposal fees, as recommended in the <br />memorandum of June 14, 2006. <br /> <br />11. DEPARTMENTAL MATTERS <br />11.A. CD <br />OMMUNITY EVELOPMENT <br />11.A.1. Appeal by Richard Torpy, Esquire, of the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission’s Decision to Deny Preliminary Plat Approval for Pelican Bay Phase II <br />County Planning Director Stan Boling presented a map, by overhead projector, describing the <br />area referred to in the appeal. The Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) agreed with staff’s <br />recommendation to deny this appeal. Phase II proposed to take Lot 5 and divide it into two lots, creating <br />Lot 6. That move would include filling in the estuarine wetland area. Future Land Use Policy states <br />where a property is estuarine wetlands, it is considered Conservation 2. The exact boundaries have been <br />set by an environmental survey, and it is staff’s contention that units proposed entirely within estuarine <br />wetlands are in Conservation 2 areas and exceed density. Wetland impacts are neither avoided nor <br />minimized by this proposal, as required. <br />June 20, 2006 <br />17 <br /> <br />