Laserfiche WebLink
<br />County for a letter of no objection to DEP so that he would be allowed to build an accessory residence <br />while he is completing his principal one. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating noted there are two conditions that Mr. Barton <br />will have to comply with to final out his demolition permit: (1) provide an engineering certification for <br />any part of the structure that he wants to remain, and that certification has to document that it is a usable <br />part of structure; and (2) remove debris on site or the permit would not be final and staff would be able to <br />take action at that time. <br />Attorney Collins outlined the fines and code violations of Mr. Barton and provided an update on <br />legal proceedings against Mr. Barton. <br />Commissioner Bowden found this unsatisfactory and asked if there was some way research could <br />be done to discover if anyone has been successful in dealing with situations like this. <br />Mr. Gerstner <br />believed there has to be a way to stop Mr. Barton from trying to beat the system. <br />He suggested they look at his tax base to see whether or not he has been paying his taxes and that could be <br />a loophole. <br />Chairman Neuberger suggested Mr. Gerstner go to the Property Appraiser’s office to find out <br />what the taxes are. <br />Administrator Baird suggested a wait and see period until the expiration of the permit. If in 30 <br />days Mr. Barton does not get a demolition permit, it would be brought back to the Board to ask if it could <br />be legally demolished. <br />13.D. CWS.D <br />OMMISSIONER ESLEY AVIS <br />13.D.1. Resolution of Support of the Constitutional Amendment <br />Defining Marriage <br />Commissioner Davis informed the Board that a joint Resolution (No. 88) of Support of the <br />Constitutional Amendment Defining Marriage was before the House and requested that the County draft <br />a resolution supporting it. <br /> <br />June 20, 2006 <br />36 <br /> <br />