Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />(CLERKS NOTE: See also items 9.A.2., 11.I.1., and 11.I.2.) <br /> <br />Planning Director Stan Boling explained that items 9.A.1, 9.A.2., 11.I.1, and <br />11.I.2. all need to be approved for the CR 512 project to work. Director Boling used the Elmo to <br />illustrate the CR 512 project relating to this abandonment, the location of the abandonments, <br />what they are currently zoned, the owner of the current rights-of-way, and the conditions and <br />agreements attached to the abandonment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis felt there is a desperate need for a light on CR 512. It would <br />allow traffic to flow that comes in and out of the industrial section to the North, as well as <br />allowing residential traffic to make a westbound turn coming north, heading to I-95. He proposed <br />nd <br />moving 102 Terrace to connect with 101st Court and a light at that intersection. <br /> <br />nd <br />Traffic Engineer Chris Mora clarified that the current proposal is to take 102 <br />rdrdst <br />Avenue down to 93 and bring 93 over to 101 Court. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis would like to see staff address the issue after approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler suggested staff come back to the Board with the pros and <br />cons on the currently proposed project as well as Commissioner Davis’ project. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Jim Davis explained that the piece of property is part of the <br />Buffer Preserve and DEP has jurisdiction on that property, but he believed Commissioner Davis’ <br />option is viable. <br /> <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />June 21, 2005 14 <br /> <br />