My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/22/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
06/22/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:34:08 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/22/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2928
Book and Page
127, 212-256
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
428
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />13.A.1. CHAIRMAN CAROLINE D. GINN – COMMITTED <br />ROADWAYS – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF THE <br />COMP PLAN <br />Chairman Ginn spoke of what she sees as a serious matter appears improvements <br />budgeted in the Transportation Element of the Comp Plan for construction within 5 years are <br />considered committed improvements: “For travel demand forecasting and transportation planning <br />rd <br />purposes, committed improvements are considered in place and existing.” Heading the list is 43 <br />Avenue. <br />Director Keating replied that it is not considered “in place and existing” for <br />concurrency purposes. He read Policy 1.4, page 115 of the Transportation Element, explaining <br />they do not consider a project in place for capacity purposes unless it is going to be under <br />construction no more than 2 years. After the CO of the project it is a development order of <br />condition. <br />Commissioner Macht thought it seemed odd that they approved Echo Lake yet the <br />permits are issued on a concurrency basis instead of a one-by-one basis. <br /> Attorney Collins explained this was the way the requirements were structured <br />several years ago. Due to a lot of debate whether that was appropriate or not, a decision was made <br />not to frontload all impact fees at one time. <br />JUNE 22, 2004 <br />31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.