Laserfiche WebLink
To advance the discussion, Commissioner Solari asked the Board to consider combining <br />PSAC's Recommendations 1 and 2 (see pages 176 and 177), where permanent exceptions from <br />an LDR standard could be granted (with a deviation not to exceed 10%), and an alternative <br />design or improvement could be proposed that would provide a "functionally equivalent" result. <br />He also wondered whether the maximum deviation allowed in PSAC's Recommendation 1 could <br />be increased from 10% to 20%. <br />Vice Chairman Flescher noted that most of the compliance issues have involved <br />landscaping, which he felt should be staff's focus. He wanted to have the PSAC and staff <br />identify the problem LDR's and develop proposed amendments to resolve those problems, and <br />was opposed to not taking action, as presented as Alternative 1 in staff's memorandum. <br />Commissioner Wheeler felt that Recommendation 2, developing a permanent exception <br />ordinance, would be a slippery slope leading to lower overall standards. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan opined that granting the permanent exemptions would <br />unilaterally lower the LDR standards, and felt the Board should maintain consistency with the <br />policy that was established. He recalled a decision made last year, when four Commissioners <br />voted to not grant an exception to the rules and regulations for Ocean Concrete. Commissioner <br />O'Bryan supported staff's Recommendation No. 1, observing that a bad LDR should be changed <br />permanently, and not every time someone appeals to the Board. <br />Commissioner Solari wanted to know if the idea of having a "functional equivalent" <br />could be built into the LDR's. He observed that there would be no lowering of standards -- the <br />business owner could use a little creativity to do something which is a better match for the site <br />and neighborhood. <br />24 <br />June 23, 2009 <br />