My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/3/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
6/3/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 2:35:34 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/03/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2570
Book and Page
125, 408-440
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
497
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Ginn asked if Sea Oaks falls under the 1:100th restriction. <br />Chief DeBlois said Sea Oaks has that restriction, however, they are a public /private marina <br />which is different from Marbrisa or Indian River Trails. <br />Commissioner Lowther received the letter from Sea Oaks (copy on file with the backup) and <br />believed Sea Oaks should not fall under the same restriction. <br />Chief DeBlois explained all the marinas in the county would be affected by their decision. <br />Commissioner Ginn believed rearranging meant a different configuration for the dock. <br />County Attorney William G. Collins read (page 132) policies 1.13 and 1.14 from the <br />Manatee and Boating Safety Plan to assist the Board in their decision. Policy 1.13 says the 1:100 <br />(one power boat per 100' of shoreline) shall be retained in, among others, Zone 4; and Policy 1.14 <br />encourages expansion or upgrading existing boating facilities by considering the removal of the <br />1:100 shoreline ratio in other zones not including Zone 4. He reasoned that there is a direct conflict <br />in the two policies. Attorney Collins recommended the Board amend the two policies by moving <br />Zone 4 down into the area where it allows expansion of existing facilities, lifting that ratio, taking it <br />out of the area where the ratio is retained, and moving it into one where it is allowed. <br />Chairman Macht concurred. <br />Chief DeBlois said if the Board decides to go through an amendment process, they would <br />send a letter to the State and they also have to concur. <br />A brief question and answer period ensued and the Board learned that the 1:100 density ratio <br />is a common denominator utilized by all counties. When the Manatee Protection Plan was adopted <br />in Indian River County, it was intended to supersede the 1:100 density ratio. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Neuberger, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Adams for discussion, to send a letter to the State <br />Representatives informing them of the Boards interpretation of the <br />Manatee Protection Plan. <br />Sandra Clinger, 2680 Bobcat Trail, spoke on behalf of "Save the Manatee Club" members. <br />Indian River County worked a long time to develop the Manatee Protection Plan and one reason it <br />was adopted and approved by the State of Florida was because we identified critical areas, such as <br />the Jungle Trail Narrows, where they would restrict additional boat facility development and reduce <br />the number of powerboats accessing that area. She did not believe rearrangement was the core issue <br />June 3, 2003 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.