Laserfiche WebLink
rFEB 20 1980 <br />Steto 01 Flon•ie <br />DEPARTNIENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />ST. JOHNS RIVER DISTRICT <br />TO: . File t <br />THROUGH: Walt Wheeler -,')I <br />1-W <br />THROUGH: Wilbert Holliday <br />FROM: Reese Kessler {` <br />DATE: January 16, 1980 <br />SUBJECT: Indian River County - D/F <br />Paul T. Bakule <br />File No. 31-25263-4E <br />B/WQ Appraisal <br />A. <br />80L7X 42 BALE 710 <br />The applicant proposes to construct 160 feet of riprap seawall <br />to 20 feet offshore of an existing eroding bluff. The seawall <br />be 8 feet tc 10 feet offshore (maximum) of mean high water. <br />Approximately 50 cubic yards of sand will be used as backfill. <br />crass and mangroves are to be planted among the riprap. A dock <br />is also proposed but is exempt from permitting. <br />5 feet <br />will <br />Cord - <br />The project vicinity is on the barrier island side of the Indian <br />River at a point opposite the south relief canal. This section of <br />the Indian River is Class III Waters, includes the Intracoastal <br />Waterway, and has sparse to moderate development. Estuarine wetlands <br />of noticable size have been impounded for mosquito control. The <br />remaining wetlands occur as fringes along the riverfront. <br />Development practices have included the clearing of trees which <br />often also means the removal or cutting of shoreline vegetation. <br />The end result leaves the lot owner with the responsibility of <br />preventing erosion and protecting upland property. Erosion control <br />techniques vary but replanting of marine vegetation with sloping <br />riprap has been shown to be the most cost effective and to be <br />harmonious with the surrounding environment. This is most <br />evident in the waterfront lots near the applicant's. <br />M - Rev 7/76 <br />For Routing To Dirtrict Offices <br />And/Or To Other Than The Addressee <br />To: <br />Loctn.' <br />To: <br />Loctn.: <br />, <br />To: <br />x, Loctn.: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />ST. JOHNS RIVER DISTRICT <br />TO: . File t <br />THROUGH: Walt Wheeler -,')I <br />1-W <br />THROUGH: Wilbert Holliday <br />FROM: Reese Kessler {` <br />DATE: January 16, 1980 <br />SUBJECT: Indian River County - D/F <br />Paul T. Bakule <br />File No. 31-25263-4E <br />B/WQ Appraisal <br />A. <br />80L7X 42 BALE 710 <br />The applicant proposes to construct 160 feet of riprap seawall <br />to 20 feet offshore of an existing eroding bluff. The seawall <br />be 8 feet tc 10 feet offshore (maximum) of mean high water. <br />Approximately 50 cubic yards of sand will be used as backfill. <br />crass and mangroves are to be planted among the riprap. A dock <br />is also proposed but is exempt from permitting. <br />5 feet <br />will <br />Cord - <br />The project vicinity is on the barrier island side of the Indian <br />River at a point opposite the south relief canal. This section of <br />the Indian River is Class III Waters, includes the Intracoastal <br />Waterway, and has sparse to moderate development. Estuarine wetlands <br />of noticable size have been impounded for mosquito control. The <br />remaining wetlands occur as fringes along the riverfront. <br />Development practices have included the clearing of trees which <br />often also means the removal or cutting of shoreline vegetation. <br />The end result leaves the lot owner with the responsibility of <br />preventing erosion and protecting upland property. Erosion control <br />techniques vary but replanting of marine vegetation with sloping <br />riprap has been shown to be the most cost effective and to be <br />harmonious with the surrounding environment. This is most <br />evident in the waterfront lots near the applicant's. <br />M - Rev 7/76 <br />