My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/6/2007
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
06/6/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 11:20:59 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:12:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Other
Archived Roll/Disk#
3132
Subject
Presentation St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD)
Land exchange Berry Groves; Pat Corrigan Family Partnership; Hugh Corrigan Family Partnership
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3071
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recedes from extreme drought. He explained that the purpose of the drainage system is to <br />collect water from the lots and roads and convey that to stormwater collection for storage <br />treatment and ultimately discharge. He concluded by promising the Association that <br />SJRWMD would resolve the issue regarding the conflict between the drainage <br />requirements of St. Johns and the County’s requirements for a landscape berm. <br /> <br />Commissioner Flescher clarified that as a result of the findings, the <br />developer is fully responsible and that it would not be a burden to the citizens of the <br />community. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Bryan wanted to know what “teeth” St. Johns has in order <br />to enforce the permits since a performance bond is not required. Mr. Slate explained that <br />in regards to mitigation, the performance bond is typically required when there are <br />wetland impacts. <br /> <br />(Clerk’s Note: Chairman Wheeler arrived at 4:18 p.m.) <br /> <br />Mr. Slate <br /> explained that the permit had not been turned over and that the <br />developer is still legally and financially responsible for correcting the situation. He said <br />the aesthetic issues of the lake level and the toe of the slope is an issue between the <br />homeowners and the developers, not St. Johns. He further explained that St. Johns still <br />retains a covenant with the developer. Mr. Slate offered to meet with the residents of the <br />Homeowners Association as well as any leadership, on site, tomorrow. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis suggested that Administrator Baird send individuals <br />to meet with the group tomorrow, from Community Development, Permitting, Public <br />Works and Engineering departments. <br /> <br />ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER <br />11 <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT DISTRICT <br /> <br />June 6, 2007 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.