My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/6/2007
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
06/6/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 11:20:59 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:12:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Other
Archived Roll/Disk#
3132
Subject
Presentation St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD)
Land exchange Berry Groves; Pat Corrigan Family Partnership; Hugh Corrigan Family Partnership
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3071
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
realign the ownership of the Water Management District for the benefit of the Upper St. <br />Johns River project. Mr. Christian also revealed that this was the last phase of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Director Christianson <br /> outlined the recommendations to be submitted to <br />the SJRWMD governing Board: (1) to determine that the Sand Lakes tract is no longer <br />needed for conservation purposes, (2) to approve the real property exchange, and (3) to <br />settle the dispute involved in this transaction. Through an aerial view site map, Mr. <br />Christianson displayed the 1,265 acre Sand Lakes tract that is the portion of property <br />proposed for exchange to the Corrigan family. He also displayed the L-shaped piece of <br />property on the southwest corner of the Corrigan ranch, which would complete the <br />exchange. <br /> <br />Director Christianson <br /> presented a Conservation Needs Assessment where <br />initially they needed to preserve this property for conservation purposes. To determine <br />that the lands are needed for conservation purposes, in accordance with State Statute <br />requirements, SJRWMD’s approach was to look at: (1) the intrinsic conservation value <br />of the land, (2) the regional conservation significance of the property, (3) the original <br />conservation purpose, and (4) the net conservation benefit. He described how SJRWMD <br />has proceeded and actions taken in each of the four elements listed above. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis was confused about the criteria that SJRWMD <br />followed to select habitat conservation areas, because the northeast corner of CR 512 and <br />SR 60 is grove land. <br /> <br />Director Christianson <br /> was only presenting the results of an analysis and <br />did not have answers for Commissioner Davis; however, he knew that the original <br />mapping/satellite imagery for that area was done in the late 1980’s. <br />ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER <br />3 <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT DISTRICT <br /> <br />June 6, 2007 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.