Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Ginn called a 5-minute recess at 10:40 a.m. The Meeting was reconvened <br />at 10:48 a.m. <br /> <br />13.E. COMMISSIONER KENNETH R. MACHT – LAND <br />ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE UPDATE – <br />RESULTS OF VOTER OPINION SURVEY BY THE TRUST <br />FOR PUBLIC LAND <br /> <br />Commissioner Macht listed the properties acquired under the current land <br />acquisition bond issue and specified that a total of 5,456 residential units were taken out of <br />development by purchases using the previous LAAC bond issue funds. This indicates that it does <br />have a significant effect on development and densities. <br />Chief of Environmental & Code Enforcement and LAAC advisor Chief Roland <br />DeBlois recounted the Board’s direction to have LAAC review the concept of going to voters in <br />November on a bond referendum for additional funds. Since then, there have been two public <br />workshops, an informal questionnaire in the local newspaper for public response, and the Trust for <br />Public Land’s opinion poll which the BCC has accepted as statistically valid. Their results were <br />reported to the LAAC at its last meeting. The poll was just one tool for the Board to utilize in <br />making their decision about putting this on the ballot in November. LAAC has looked at various <br />draft ballot language and we need to finalize the ballot language for the Supervisor of Elections <br />this month. The LAAC has considered this and staff has refined some aspects of the language. <br />Staff was looking for a direction from the Board how to finalize the ballot language. Staff would <br />come back in the near future with a formal resolution to send over to the Supervisor of Elections. <br />Mr. DeBlois displayed a ballot question on the overhead that had been approved by <br />the LAAC. Mr. Will Abberger of the Trust for Public Land has recommended inclusion of certain <br />points on the ballot based on the results from the poll. One of the main areas of LAAC’s <br />discussion was the appropriateness of the language “over-development prevention” being on the <br />June 8, 2004 <br />32 <br /> <br />