Laserfiche WebLink
ITEM 15 CONCERNED PROPERTY OWNED BY ALTHERIS SHARPTON. <br />MR. SHARPTON WAS PRESENT REPRESENTING HIS .96 YEAR OLD MOTHER WHO <br />OWNS THIS PROPERTY. HE STATED THAT BECAUSE OF HER AGE SHE SIGNED <br />A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO HIM FOR THE PROPERTY, BUT HE WAS IN CALIFORNIA <br />AND IS NOW WORKING AT THE CAPE AND LIVING NEAR THE BASE, AND JUST <br />RECEIVED NOTICE. MR. SHARPTON STATED THAT HE NOTICED THE CONDITION <br />OF THE PROPERTY HIMSELF AND PUT IN FOR A LOAN BECAUSE THE HURRICANE <br />DID QUITE A BIT OF DAMAGE. HE CONTINUED THAT HE HAS RECEIVED AN <br />APPROVED LOAN AND IS GOING TO DO WHATEVER IS NECESSARY TO RECTIFY <br />THE SITUATION. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HIS COUSIN LIVES ON THE <br />PROPERTY NOW, AND THERE IS A HOUSE AND TWO TRAILERS ON THE PROPERTY. <br />MRS. RYMER AGREED THERE IS MORE THAN ONE STRUCTURE, AND <br />STATED THAT THE NOTICE REFERS TO THE ONE THAT IS EMPTY. SHE SHOWED <br />MR. SHARPTON A PICTURE OF THE BUILDING THE COUNTY WISHES TO HAVE TAKEN <br />DOWN, AND STATED THAT SHE WOULD HAVE A STAFF MEMBER PERSONALLY <br />IDENTIFY THE BUILDING FOR MR. SHARPTON. <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT ASKED MR. SHARPTON IF HE WISHED THAT <br />PARTICULAR BUILDING TO BE REMOVED BY THE COUNTY, AND MR, SHARPTON <br />STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE 90 DAYS TO REMOVE IT HIMSELF. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LYONS; SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT THE EMPTY IMPROVEMENTS <br />IDENTIFIED BY THE BUILDING DIRECTOR LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY OWNED BY <br />ALTHERIS SHARPTON, (29-31-39-00000-5000-000230.0) ARE HEREBY DECLARED <br />TO BE HAZARDOUS AND ARE PRESENTING A SAFETY AND HEALTH THREAT TO <br />THE CITIZENS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND MOVED THAT THE HAZARDOUS <br />STRUCTURE BE DECLARED A NUISANCE AND IF NOT REMOVED WITHIN NINETY <br />(90) DAYS FROM TODAY BY PAIR. SHARPTON, SAID HAZARDOUS STRUCTURE SHALL <br />THEREAFTER BE REMOVED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR <br />AND A LIEN SHALL BE FILED AGAINST THE PROPERTY IN THE EVENT THE COSTS <br />OF REMOVAL ARE NOT PAID BY THE OWNER. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED IN REGARD TO ITEM 16, LAILA W. JACKSON <br />AND GERTRUDE W. SCHOCKLIFORD. ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE DID <br />MAR 51980 K�� <br />